Most employers meet the hazardous materials business plan requirement for the first time when an inspector arrives, which is the worst possible moment to discover that the quantities on site crossed a threshold two years ago.
The three numbers
A hazardous materials business plan is triggered by quantity, not by industry. Under Health and Safety Code division 20, chapter 6.95, sections 25500 through 25519, and the implementing regulations at 19 CCR division 2, chapter 4, a facility that handles a hazardous material at or above any of these amounts at any one time is in the program:
- 55 gallons of a liquid
- 500 pounds of a solid
- 200 cubic feet of a compressed gas, at standard temperature and pressure
Fifty-five gallons is one drum. Two hundred cubic feet is a couple of cylinders on a rack. These are not industrial quantities. Print shops, machine shops, breweries, dental and veterinary practices, auto shops and property managers with a pool chemical room all cross them routinely, and most are surprised to hear it.
There are lower thresholds for certain materials, and there are local variations, because the program is administered by a Certified Unified Program Agency rather than by the state directly. Your CUPA is usually the county environmental health department or a city fire department. Which one it is determines the forms, the inspection cycle and the fee schedule.
What actually goes in the plan
The plan is not a narrative document. It is a structured disclosure with four working parts: a business activities page, an owner and operator identification page, a chemical inventory with quantities and storage locations, and a site map. Behind those sit the emergency response plan and the employee training records, which is where most plans are actually deficient.
The site map is the piece people underestimate. It has to show storage areas, the locations of the materials on the inventory, entrances and exits, evacuation routes, and utility shutoffs. An inspector standing in the parking lot with your map should be able to find the chlorine room. If the map is a marketing floor plan with a few boxes drawn on it, that will be obvious immediately.
Filing, and the part that recurs
Since 2013 the filing is electronic, through the California Environmental Reporting System. Everything goes into CERS: the inventory, the map, the plan, and the certifications.
The obligation is annual. Health and Safety Code section 25508 requires the business plan to be submitted each year, and the specific date is set by the CUPA. Beyond the annual cycle, the inventory has to be updated when what is on site changes materially, which for a facility that adds or drops a chemical mid-year means a submission then rather than a note to deal with it at renewal.
The failure mode is almost never a refusal to comply. It is a facility that filed accurately in year one, changed a supplier or a product line in year two, and never went back into CERS. The inventory is then wrong, and an inventory that is wrong is worse than one that is late, because it is what the responding fire agency will rely on.
Why the fire service cares about this document
I spent twenty-five years in the fire service before I did this work, and the business plan is one of the few compliance documents whose real audience is not a regulator. It is the crew arriving at two in the morning.
What that crew wants to know, in order, is what is inside, how much, where in the building, and what happens if it burns or if water hits it. Every one of those answers is supposed to be in the plan. When the inventory is stale, the decisions made in the first ten minutes are made on the wrong information, and the consequences of that fall on people who had nothing to do with the filing.
That is the argument I make to employers who see the program as paperwork. The citation is the smallest thing at stake in it.
Michael Karl McNeil is a former Fire Battalion Chief and an industrial hygiene and environmental health and safety consultant. Thresholds and filing dates vary by CUPA; this is a general description of the program and not advice for any particular facility.
Michael Karl McNeil 
Leave a comment